From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
mel@csn.ul.ie
Subject: Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:58:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081226152804.GB5100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081226102716.GA31450@uranus.ravnborg.org>
* Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> [2008-12-26 11:27:16]:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 02:05:47AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > > * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> [2008-12-24 12:34:41]:
> > >
> > >> --
> > >
> > > After the applying the patch, the kernel panic's with the same backtrace. The
> > > box is running Fedora 5 on it.
> > >
> >
> > please try...
> > Ingo, do we need to switch to use #idef and inline function instead?
>
> I recall David Howells had a similar issue with the bootparamter patch set.
> The workaround he used was to add a barrier(); call in the weak function
> to avoid the inline.
>
> [full context kept as I added David to to: list].
> Sam
>
Hi Yinghai,
Thanks, after applying the patch, the kernel boot's up fine.
> >
> > YH
> >
> >
> > [PATCH] sparseirq: add printk to workaround compiler optimizing
> >
> > Impact: fix panic on null pointer with sparseirq
> >
> > some compiler seems to inline the weak global function.
> > try to workaround it
> >
> > also remove duplicated arch_early_irq_init()
> > already have one weak copy in init/main.c
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yinghai <yinghai@kernel.org>
> >
> > ---
> > init/main.c | 2 ++
> > kernel/irq/handle.c | 7 ++-----
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/init/main.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/init/main.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/init/main.c
> > @@ -544,10 +544,12 @@ void __init __weak thread_info_cache_ini
> >
> > void __init __weak arch_early_irq_init(void)
> > {
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling __weak arch_early_irq_init\n");
> > }
> >
> > void __init __weak early_irq_init(void)
> > {
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling __weak early_irq_init\n");
> > arch_early_irq_init();
> > }
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/handle.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
> > @@ -56,10 +56,6 @@ void handle_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, st
> > int nr_irqs = NR_IRQS;
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nr_irqs);
> >
> > -void __init __attribute__((weak)) arch_early_irq_init(void)
> > -{
> > -}
> > -
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> > static struct irq_desc irq_desc_init = {
> > .irq = -1,
> > @@ -90,8 +86,9 @@ void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *de
> > desc->kstat_irqs = (unsigned int *)ptr;
> > }
> >
> > -void __attribute__((weak)) arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
> > +void __weak arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
> > {
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling __weak arch_init_chip_data\n");
> > }
> >
> > static void init_one_irq_desc(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
> > --
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-26 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-16 11:37 linux-next: Tree for December 16 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-16 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-17 6:59 ` linux-next: mtd tree build failures (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16) Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-17 9:32 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-12-17 9:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-17 7:07 ` linux-next: Tree for December 16 Artem Bityutskiy
2008-12-17 7:08 ` next-20081216 - powerpc link error 'dynreloc miscount' Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-17 7:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-17 7:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-19 10:54 ` [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-19 11:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-19 13:46 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-19 21:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-23 13:21 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-23 21:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-24 16:34 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-24 20:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-26 9:12 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-26 10:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-26 10:27 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-26 13:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-26 13:42 ` [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 4:09 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-27 10:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-28 23:27 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-26 15:28 ` Kamalesh Babulal [this message]
2008-12-26 15:33 ` [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask Ingo Molnar
2008-12-26 17:04 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-26 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 7:11 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-27 7:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27 7:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 11:21 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-27 11:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 11:57 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-27 12:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 15:29 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-27 21:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-28 12:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-28 16:11 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-28 23:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27 5:05 ` [PATCH] perf_counter: more barrier in blank weak function Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27 5:06 ` [PATCH] kgdb: " Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 8:34 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-27 6:07 ` [PATCH] perf_counter: " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-27 9:46 ` [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask David Howells
2008-12-27 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081226152804.GB5100@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).