Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> 
> * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Rusty,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the rr_cpumask tree got a conflict in
> > arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c between commit
> > 22f65d31b25a320a5246592160bcb102d2791c45 ("x86: Update io_apic.c to use
> > new cpumask API") from the cpus4096 tree and commit
> > 2ca1a615835d9f4990f42102ab1f2ef434e7e89c ("Merge branch 'master' of
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6") (or
> > something - I suspect git has failed me a little here) from the
> > rr_cpumask tree.
> > 
> > It is a bit of a train wreck :-)
> > 
> > I have dropped the rr_cpumask tree for today and also the rr tree that 
> > depends on it.
> 
> hm, i'll work with Rusty on fixing that - you should really not be 
> seeing conflicts on that level.

ok, i think i got it all sorted out - there will be a new cpus4096 tree 
later today (if it passes the tests) that should merge cleanly with 
Rusty's latest.

	Ingo