From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:19:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090106131908.GB15228@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496358F8.30308@sgi.com>
* Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Monday 05 January 2009 23:17:45 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> That would allow Mike, Christoph and you to work this out cleanly from
> >> scratch. It would also solve your merge conflict.
> >>
> >> Does that sound like a good solution?
> >
> > Sure, but it won't make this window. I guess since those patches
> > don't do anything but lay groundwork it's not critical, but annoying
> > they've lain fallow so long.
> >
> > I'm happy to put them with the cpualloc patches, since they're related
> > and going to conflict, but I still want to see if Mike has the rest of
> > them?
>
> I do. And really, as soon as the cpus4096 is safely set for 2.6.29 I
> can devote much more time on it.
I think the complete elimination of cpumask_t should be the primary
priority - before jumping to any other aspect. If we dont get rid of it it
will stick around forever, like the BKL. It was a nice migration helper
but now it's time to wave goodbye? :)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 3:32 linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-05 6:57 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-05 12:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-06 8:51 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-06 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-06 13:13 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-06 13:19 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-01-06 14:21 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-06 14:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-07 2:46 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-05 15:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-06 1:04 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-06 15:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-07 2:47 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-07 16:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-07 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-07 19:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-08 20:48 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-08 20:50 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-08 21:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-08 21:49 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-08 22:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-08 22:25 ` David Miller
2009-01-09 14:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-09 22:54 ` David Miller
2009-01-05 19:46 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-05 8:41 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-06 3:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-06 13:26 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-09 1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-06 3:11 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 7:51 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 7:47 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 8:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-22 6:32 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-22 7:58 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-22 8:45 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-01-04 23:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-05 4:36 ` Greg KH
2009-01-05 5:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-16 5:29 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-15 6:15 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24 3:20 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-20 3:24 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-20 4:28 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-14 4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-14 4:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-14 4:30 ` David Miller
2008-11-14 4:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-14 4:41 ` David Miller
2008-11-14 5:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-14 6:42 ` David Miller
2008-11-15 22:32 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-17 2:57 ` David Miller
2008-11-07 5:01 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-29 4:28 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-29 4:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-29 22:42 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-28 2:55 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-28 7:19 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-10-28 7:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-27 3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-24 2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-23 4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-23 5:16 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-23 12:26 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-23 12:50 ` Mike Travis
2008-10-23 4:01 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-23 7:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-23 13:32 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-23 3:56 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-23 12:25 ` Rusty Russell
2008-09-12 21:53 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-28 3:16 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-28 3:13 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-28 3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-22 4:58 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-22 14:21 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-16 8:15 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-17 5:46 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-18 4:31 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-14 6:52 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-03 5:03 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-03 5:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-03 8:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-03 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-04 0:45 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-04 0:29 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-25 6:27 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25 6:38 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-25 15:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25 6:27 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25 7:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-25 8:33 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090106131908.GB15228@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).