From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:48:31 +1030 Message-ID: <200901101648.32757.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20090108171730.19a41e14.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <496636AB.9000903@oracle.com> <20090109092322.fd43b3b6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:58574 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752936AbZAJGSr (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:18:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090109092322.fd43b3b6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Randy Dunlap On Friday 09 January 2009 08:53:22 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > (Forward to Rusty) > > On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:23:55 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20090107: > > > > > > Undropped tree: > > > rr > > > > > > Dropped trees (temporarily): > > > ocfs2 (build problem) > > > cpu_alloc (build problem) > > > > > > When CONFIG_SMP=n, both arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h and > > include/asm-generic/percpu.h define both of > > read_percpu_ptr() and read_percpu_var(). Erk... this header is a bit of a mess of 64bit/32bit UP/SMP defines. I've thwacked it harder, thanks! Rusty.