From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:32:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20090112093214.GA6798@elte.hu> References: <20090112104837.69feedec.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1231719015.22571.4.camel@pasglop> <20090112090552.GD26750@elte.hu> <20090112202427.3b918490.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:44379 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751462AbZALJcl (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:32:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090112202427.3b918490.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Linus Torvalds , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , Mike Travis , Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , LKML , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > It slipped through because it didnt get caught in build tests because > > cpufreq isnt enabled in the powerpc defconfig. > > Which is one of the reasons we have linux-next: "integration testing". Build bugs slipped through that net too in the past. And we dont really want developers and maintainers to rely on an external middle man facility to be able to submit patches. So the best method is to make the defconfigs good enough to catch everyday build bugs. Random testing and linux-next can then catch the weird special cases as well. Ingo