* 2.6.30 material is OK now?
@ 2009-01-19 23:28 David Miller
2009-01-20 1:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2009-01-19 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sfr; +Cc: linux-next
Stephen is it OK for 2.6.30 bound material to start
showing up in -next?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.30 material is OK now?
2009-01-19 23:28 2.6.30 material is OK now? David Miller
@ 2009-01-20 1:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-01-20 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: linux-next
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 343 bytes --]
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:28:09 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> Stephen is it OK for 2.6.30 bound material to start
> showing up in -next?
Yep, see my other email. Thanks for asking, though.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-20 1:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-19 23:28 2.6.30 material is OK now? David Miller
2009-01-20 1:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).