From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (DST) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:30:47 +0300 Message-ID: <20090119183046.GA28947@ioremap.net> References: <20090119172732.e772d8ea.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4974C288.7030301@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from tservice.net.ru ([195.178.208.66]:59691 "EHLO tservice.net.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752243AbZASSan (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:30:43 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4974C288.7030301@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Greg KH Hi Randy. On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:12:24AM -0800, Randy Dunlap (randy.dunlap@oracle.com) wrote: > > There will be no build results for today's linux-next as our build server > > has failed. > > > > Changes since 20090116: > > > DST build fails when CONFIG_BLOCK=n: DST should depend on block and block device, in the original patch its kconfig entry was in the BLK_DEV menu, so this dependency was satisfied automatically. Should attached patch be pushed into drivers/staging? --- ./drivers/staging/dst/Kconfig~ 2009-01-14 02:10:02.000000000 +0300 +++ ./drivers/staging/dst/Kconfig 2009-01-19 21:31:19.000000000 +0300 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ config DST tristate "Distributed storage" - depends on NET && CRYPTO && SYSFS + depends on NET && CRYPTO && SYSFS && BLK_DEV select CONNECTOR ---help--- DST is a network block device storage, which can be used to organize -- Evgeniy Polyakov