From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (DST) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:57:04 -0800 Message-ID: <20090119185704.GA6407@suse.de> References: <20090119172732.e772d8ea.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4974C288.7030301@oracle.com> <20090119183046.GA28947@ioremap.net> <4974CAD2.8050500@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52629 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752148AbZASS7q (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:59:46 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4974CAD2.8050500@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:47:46AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > Hi Randy. > > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:12:24AM -0800, Randy Dunlap (randy.dunlap@oracle.com) wrote: > >>> There will be no build results for today's linux-next as our build server > >>> has failed. > >>> > >>> Changes since 20090116: > >> > >> DST build fails when CONFIG_BLOCK=n: > > > > DST should depend on block and block device, in the original patch its > > kconfig entry was in the BLK_DEV menu, so this dependency was satisfied > > automatically. Should attached patch be pushed into drivers/staging? > > Yes, thanks. > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap Thanks, I'll queue it up for inclusion in my tree tomorrow. greg k-h