From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: new xfs git tree
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:41:30 -0800
Message-ID: <20090126224130.53949fda.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20090119011601.GA14708@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:36194 "EHLO
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751678AbZA0GmI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:42:08 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20090119011601.GA14708@infradead.org>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:16:01 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs.git has all the fixes the
> have been peer-reviewed by the usual crowd, but still waiting for
> a "maintainer" to respond..

Should we include that in linux-next?