* Re: new xfs git tree [not found] <20090119011601.GA14708@infradead.org> @ 2009-01-27 6:41 ` Andrew Morton 2009-01-29 21:14 ` Felix Blyakher 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-01-27 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: xfs, linux-next On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:16:01 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs.git has all the fixes the > have been peer-reviewed by the usual crowd, but still waiting for > a "maintainer" to respond.. Should we include that in linux-next? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: new xfs git tree 2009-01-27 6:41 ` new xfs git tree Andrew Morton @ 2009-01-29 21:14 ` Felix Blyakher 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Felix Blyakher @ 2009-01-29 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, linux-next, xfs On Jan 27, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:16:01 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org > > wrote: > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs.git has all the fixes the >> have been peer-reviewed by the usual crowd, but still waiting for >> a "maintainer" to respond.. > > Should we include that in linux-next? As a new maintainer, I confirm that official xfs repository git://oss.sgi.com/oss/git/xfs/xfs was synced with kernel.org repo at one point and is being updated with the new patches on a regular basis. AFAIK, it's up-to-date now. Felix ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-29 21:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20090119011601.GA14708@infradead.org>
2009-01-27 6:41 ` new xfs git tree Andrew Morton
2009-01-29 21:14 ` Felix Blyakher
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).