linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: davej@redhat.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:core/printk] printk: introduce printk_once()
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:12:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902051512.11140.trenn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090205130420.GA10525@elte.hu>

On Thursday 05 February 2009 14:04:20 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> 
> > printk_once() would be nice indeed - it's a frequent construct.
> 
> Something like the patch below?
Yes, nice.
Sorry, I can't test it right now, I really have to do something else.
I can give it a test in some hours or tomorrow.

I'd also wait a week with the WARN_ONCE cleanup until this is
in linux-next and then fix it up correctly just "once" :)

powernow-k8 printing a backtrace in linux-next in broken BIOS case
for a week or two shouldn't be an issue.

No need to answer, just tell me if this does not work out.

Thanks for your suggestions,

   Thomas
 
> 	Ingo
> 
> ---------------->
> Author:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:45:43 +0100
> Commit:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> CommitDate: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:52:29 +0100
> 
> printk: introduce printk_once()
> 
> This pattern shows up frequently in the kernel:
> 
>   static int once = 1;
>   ...
> 
> 		if (once) {
> 			once = 0;
> 			printk(KERN_ERR "message\n");
> 		}
>   ...
> 
> So add a printk_once() helper macro that reduces this to a single line
> of:
> 
> 		printk_once(KERN_ERR "message\n");
> 
> It works analogously to WARN_ONCE() & friends. (We use a macro not
> an inline because vararg expansion in inlines looks awkward and the
> macro is simple enough.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> 
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/kernel.h |   17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index 343df9e..3c183d9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -242,6 +242,19 @@ extern struct ratelimit_state printk_ratelimit_state;
>  extern int printk_ratelimit(void);
>  extern bool printk_timed_ratelimit(unsigned long *caller_jiffies,
>  				   unsigned int interval_msec);
> +
> +/*
> + * Print a one-time message (analogous to WARN_ONCE() et al):
> + */
> +#define printk_once(x...) ({			\
> +	static int __print_once = 1;		\
> +						\
> +	if (__print_once) {			\
> +		__print_once = 0;		\
> +		printk(x);			\
> +	}					\
> +})
> +
>  #else
>  static inline int vprintk(const char *s, va_list args)
>  	__attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 0)));
> @@ -253,6 +266,10 @@ static inline int printk_ratelimit(void) { return 0; }
>  static inline bool printk_timed_ratelimit(unsigned long *caller_jiffies, \
>  					  unsigned int interval_msec)	\
>  		{ return false; }
> +
> +/* No effect, but we still get type checking even in the !PRINTK case: */
> +#define printk_once(x...) printk(x)
> +
>  #endif
>  
>  extern int printk_needs_cpu(int cpu);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-05 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-05 10:18 On top fixes for my last patches Thomas Renninger
2009-02-05 10:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Forgot to use printk instead of WARN_ONCE in last patch Thomas Renninger
2009-02-05 12:02   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 12:09     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-05 12:33       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 12:53         ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-05 13:26           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 12:27     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-05 12:42       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 13:04         ` [tip:core/printk] printk: introduce printk_once() Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 14:12           ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2009-02-05 10:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] CPUFREQ: Use static or it won't compile if conservative and ondemand are set =y Thomas Renninger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200902051512.11140.trenn@suse.de \
    --to=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).