From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the x86 tree
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:29:26 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090209152926.eb828eb2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
Hi Rusty,
Today's linux-next merge of the rr tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/include/asm/numaq/apic.h between commit
5a44632f77a9c867621f7bf80c233eac75fea672 ("x86, numaq: consolidate code")
from the x86 tree and commit 2bd9413a5deca2b0b764cad0e23dfabd28cbf7fc
("cpumask:remove-address-of-CPU_MASK_ALL") from the rr tree.
The former moved all the code from that file into
arch/x86/mach-generic/numaq.c which was further consolidated into
arch/x86/kernel/numaq_32.c by commit
61b90b7ca10cc65d8b850ab542859dc593e5a381 ("x86, NUMAQ: Consolidate code").
I applied the following patch to the merge of the rr tree and can carry it
as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/numaq_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/numaq_32.c
index 0cc41a1..6ed0834 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/numaq_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/numaq_32.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ numaq_store_NMI_vector(unsigned short *high, unsigned short *low)
static inline const cpumask_t *numaq_target_cpus(void)
{
- return &CPU_MASK_ALL;
+ return cpu_all_mask;
}
static inline unsigned long
next reply other threads:[~2009-02-09 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-09 4:29 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-17 2:43 linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the x86 tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-05 3:59 Stephen Rothwell
2009-02-09 4:29 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090209152926.eb828eb2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox