From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:29:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090211012925.GC28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4991DBA0.1000008@oracle.com>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:55:12AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20090209:
> >
> > Dropped trees (temporarily):
> > audit (difficult conflicts)
>
>
> Maybe this is fixed by the dropped audit tree?
Everything in the public audit tree is applied, AFAICT (and for-{linus,next}
is reset to current mainline HEAD to avoid the conflicts; sorry about
that).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-11 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-10 8:41 linux-next: Tree for February 10 Stephen Rothwell
2009-02-10 9:23 ` next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 9:54 ` Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 11:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-12 1:45 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-12 1:47 ` David Miller
2009-02-12 11:28 ` Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-12 11:28 ` Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-12 11:28 ` Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 10:30 ` Next Feb 10 : build/break arch/s390kernel.irq.o Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 11:15 ` [Patch] [s390] Fix init irq proc build break Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 11:40 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-02-10 10:45 ` Next Feb 10 build break on s390 : mm/shmem.c Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 13:40 ` Mimi Zohar
2009-02-10 19:55 ` linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima) Randy Dunlap
2009-02-10 22:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-02-11 0:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2009-02-12 17:54 ` [PATCH -next] security/audit/ima: fix build error Randy Dunlap
2009-02-12 18:24 ` Mimi Zohar
2009-02-12 18:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-02-12 22:31 ` James Morris
2009-02-11 1:29 ` Al Viro [this message]
2009-02-11 2:27 ` linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima) Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090211012925.GC28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).