public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: manual merge of the stackprotector tree with the x86 tree
@ 2009-02-17  1:34 Stephen Rothwell
  2009-02-17 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-02-17  1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: linux-next

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 439 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the stackprotector tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c between various commits from the x86 tree
and commit 18e7651254221ad0d3cf993cce742858c4521c55 ("manual merge of
stackprotector") from the stackprotector tree.

I just used the version of this file from tip/master.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the stackprotector tree with the x86 tree
  2009-02-17  1:34 linux-next: manual merge of the stackprotector tree with the x86 tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-02-17 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
  2009-02-17 11:49   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-02-17 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, linux-next


* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the stackprotector tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c between various commits from the x86 tree
> and commit 18e7651254221ad0d3cf993cce742858c4521c55 ("manual merge of
> stackprotector") from the stackprotector tree.
> 
> I just used the version of this file from tip/master.

ok - i also eliminated the conflict so interaction should go 
away in the next integration.

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the stackprotector tree with the x86 tree
  2009-02-17 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-02-17 11:49   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-02-17 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, linux-next

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 304 bytes --]

Hi Ingo,

On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:58:39 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> ok - i also eliminated the conflict so interaction should go 
> away in the next integration.

Thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-17 11:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-17  1:34 linux-next: manual merge of the stackprotector tree with the x86 tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-02-17 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-17 11:49   ` Stephen Rothwell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox