From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] module: fix build for CONFIG_SYSFS=n Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:15:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20090218191529.GC8889@elte.hu> References: <20090218191640.0b023029.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <499C4D35.9000104@oracle.com> <20090218180932.GC19995@elte.hu> <499C54E8.7060004@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <499C54E8.7060004@oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Rusty Russell List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org * Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Is destroy_params() dependent on SYSFS? If yes then it would be > > Yes. > > > far cleaner if there was a NOP destroy_params() inline for the > > !SYSFS case. > > > > > From: Randy Dunlap > > Fix this build error when CONFIG_SYSFS=n: > > kernel/built-in.o: In function `free_module': > module.c:(.text+0x4f8a2): undefined reference to `destroy_params' > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap > cc: Rusty Russell > --- > kernel/params.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > --- linux-next-20090218.orig/kernel/params.c > +++ linux-next-20090218/kernel/params.c > @@ -761,6 +761,12 @@ static int __init param_sysfs_init(void) > } > subsys_initcall(param_sysfs_init); > > +#else /* !CONFIG_SYSFS */ > + > +inline void destroy_params(const struct kernel_param *params, unsigned num) > +{ > +} > + > #endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */ thanks! Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Ingo