From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:18:26 +1100 Message-ID: <20090315121826.GA25955@disturbed> References: <20090310134547.e5d1d9ee.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090312120441.b9839805.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net ([203.16.214.145]:9584 "EHLO ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754411AbZCOMSc (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:18:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090312120441.b9839805.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:04:41PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi David, > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:45:47 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > In file included from fs/xfs/support/debug.c:21: > > fs/xfs/xfs_error.h:137: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'xfs_mount_t' > > fs/xfs/xfs_error.h:138: error: expected ')' before '*' token > > This is still happening. Yes, there is a reviewed patch that doesn't appear to have been checked into the tree yet.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com