From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:09:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090421060916.GB18771@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090421031049.GA4140@in.ibm.com>
* Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:27:06AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) produced this new
> > warning:
> >
> > kernel/sched.c: In function 'find_new_ilb':
> > kernel/sched.c:4355: warning: passing argument 1 of '__first_cpu' from incompatible pointer type
> >
> > Possibly caused by commit f711f6090a81cbd396b63de90f415d33f563af9b
> > ("sched: Nominate idle load balancer from a semi-idle package") from the
> > sched tree. Should this call to first_cpu be cpumask_first?
>
> Yes, it should be cpumask_first. Patch appended.
>
> -->
> sched: Replace first_cpu() with cpumask_first() in ILB nomination code.
>
> From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
>
> For !(CONFIG_SCHED_MC || CONFIG_SCHED_SMT), find_new_ilb() nominates the
> Idle load balancer as the first cpu from the nohz.cpu_mask.
>
> This code uses the older API first_cpu(). Replace it with cpumask_first(),
> which is the correct API here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> kernel/sched.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index bbf367d..6df8dd5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -4344,7 +4344,7 @@ out_done:
> #else /* (CONFIG_SCHED_MC || CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) */
> static inline int find_new_ilb(int call_cpu)
> {
> - return first_cpu(nohz.cpu_mask);
> + return cpumask_first(nohz.cpu_mask);
Given that this is not an onstack cpumask the type mismatch is
harmless in effect but obviously needs fixed.
I've applied your fix to tip:sched/core - thanks guys.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-21 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-21 0:27 linux-next: sched tree build warning Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-21 3:10 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-04-21 3:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-21 6:09 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-04-21 6:21 ` Rusty Russell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-07 1:21 Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-07 6:45 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-07 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-22 4:22 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-22 6:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-22 6:49 ` Ken Chen
2008-12-22 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-22 7:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-22 8:14 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-22 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-22 9:44 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-22 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-22 12:03 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090421060916.GB18771@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).