From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: next: x86/msr.h: build fails
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:14:46 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090520101446.GA16517@orion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090520094141.GA16421@orion>
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:41:41PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> Hi Borislav,
>
> What do you think about this fix?
> I have no idea what value should be for the cpu variable.
This patch should be better.
This is !SMP code, then cpu=0 is ok.
From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: msr.h: fix build error
Fix this build error:
.../asm/msr.h: In function 'rdmsr_on_cpus':
.../asm/msr.h:248: error: request for member 'l' in something not a structure or union
.../asm/msr.h:248: error: request for member 'h' in something not a structure or union
.../asm/msr.h:248: error: too few arguments to function 'rdmsr_on_cpu'
.../asm/msr.h: In function 'wrmsr_on_cpus':
.../asm/msr.h:253: error: request for member 'l' in something not a structure or union
.../asm/msr.h:253: error: request for member 'h' in something not a structure or union
.../asm/msr.h:253: error: too few arguments to function 'wrmsr_on_cpu'
This is !SMP code so `cpu` should be 0.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index e49c14e..fa082ba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -243,14 +243,14 @@ static inline int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
return 0;
}
static inline int rdmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *m, u32 msr_no,
- struct msr **msrs)
+ struct msr *msrs)
{
- return rdmsr_on_cpu(msr_no, &(msrs[0].l), &(msrs[0].h));
+ return rdmsr_on_cpu(0, msr_no, &(msrs[0].l), &(msrs[0].h));
}
static inline int wrmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *m, u32 msr_no,
- struct msr **msrs)
+ struct msr *msrs)
{
- return wrmsr_on_cpu(msr_no, msrs[0].l, msrs[0].h);
+ return wrmsr_on_cpu(0, msr_no, msrs[0].l, msrs[0].h);
}
static inline int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no,
u32 *l, u32 *h)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-20 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-20 9:41 next: x86/msr.h: build fails Alexander Beregalov
2009-05-20 10:14 ` Alexander Beregalov [this message]
2009-05-20 16:06 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090520101446.GA16517@orion \
--to=a.beregalov@gmail.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).