From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: linux-next: voyager tree build failure Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:40:38 +1000 Message-ID: <20090609194038.826289f3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__9_Jun_2009_19_40_38_+1000_+0xhiShooKVDlnZ." Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:36586 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755557AbZFIJkm (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 05:40:42 -0400 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Tue__9_Jun_2009_19_40_38_+1000_+0xhiShooKVDlnZ. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi James, Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: arch/x86/xen/smp.c:478: error: 'apic_safe_smp_processor_id' undeclared here= (not in a function) arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:219: error: 'apic_safe_smp_processor_id' undeclared h= ere (not in a function) Caused by commit 6a6df48477c1959b1baa78ecabba72548d362f60 ("[VOYAGER] x86: add {safe,hard}_smp_processor_id to smp_ops"). I have dropped the voyager tree for today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__9_Jun_2009_19_40_38_+1000_+0xhiShooKVDlnZ. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkouLhYACgkQjjKRsyhoI8yiLgCeKi9Jl7C9la6DirYNS2Zua2qZ 6C4AnjMcug2LPnWtHi3eHuptn9rgd5dm =SDZU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__9_Jun_2009_19_40_38_+1000_+0xhiShooKVDlnZ.--