public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the asm-generic tree with Linus' tree
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:05:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906121005.33490.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090612164914.e03160af.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Friday 12 June 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the asm-generic tree got a conflict in
> include/asm-generic/atomic.h between commit
> 53e111a730ea8b002d57dd226098c12789993329 ("x86: Fix atomic_long_xchg() on
> 64bit") from Linus' tree and commit
> 72099ed2719fc5829bd79c6ca9d1783ed026eb37 ("asm-generic: rename atomic.h
> to atomic-long.h") from the asm-generic tree.
> 
> I applied the fix from the former patch to atomic-long.h

Hi Stephen,

I pulled Linus' tree into the asm-generic tree now and fixed the two conflicts
in the same way you did. I thought about doing a rebase on his tree instead,
but wasn't sure what works better.

	Arnd <><

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-12  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-12  6:49 linux-next: manual merge of the asm-generic tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-12  8:05 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-06-12  8:18   ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-07 22:38 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-08  8:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-02 23:22 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-09 22:38 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-12  6:43 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200906121005.33490.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox