From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baruch Siach Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:24:08 +0300 Message-ID: <20090625032407.GO6027@tarshish> References: <20090625111344.35febd82.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090625111344.35febd82.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linus , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Ben Dooks List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:13:44AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: >=20 > ERROR: "clk_enable" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.ko] undefined! > ERROR: "clk_disable" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.ko] undefined= ! > ERROR: "clk_put" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.ko] undefined! > ERROR: "clk_get_rate" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.ko] undefine= d! > ERROR: "clk_get" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.ko] undefined! >=20 > Caused by commit 1ab52cf910bbbee92861227e6ed77c56b1dc233c ("i2c: driv= er > for the Synopsys DesignWare I2C controller") from Linus' tree which I > have reverted for today. So, what is the right configuration symbol to depend on for the clk API= ? A short archives search led to the "provide a dummy implementation of t= he clk=20 API" patch from Uwe Kleine-K=C3nig=20 (http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0804.2/2748.html). Is t= his the=20 right solution? baruch --=20 ~. .~ Tk Open Sy= stems =3D}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo--------= ----{=3D - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -