From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: linux-next: block tree build failure Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:39:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20090626043937.GJ31415@kernel.dk> References: <20090626125331.89c689f2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:57300 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750839AbZFZEjf (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:39:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: NeilBrown Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 26 2009, NeilBrown wrote: > On Fri, June 26, 2009 12:53 pm, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Jens, > > > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > block/blk-core.c: In function '__make_request': > > block/blk-core.c:1179: error: expected ';' before 'return' > > > > Caused by commit 6cf2a6c8d01514e86a8d38e4eeed402378b635dc ("Restore > > barrier support for md and probably other virtual devices") which I have > > reverted for today. > > Arg, that's my fault - sorry. > > + bio_endio(bio, -EOPNOTSUPP) > + return 0; > > should of course be > > + bio_endio(bio, -EOPNOTSUPP); > + return 0; I was certain I ran it through a compile cycle, sorry about that Stephen. And Neil sending uncompiled patches, very uncool. Did you even test it? I've pulled it for now. -- Jens Axboe