From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: Boot failure on x86_64 (OOPS set_cpu_sibling_map() ) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:31:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20090804143150.GC1870@aftab> References: <20090730182143.eadf36e6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A718338.6050907@in.ibm.com> <20090730135623.GB16659@aftab> <20090803093144.GC9074@elte.hu> <20090803101401.GA14442@aftab> <20090803120739.GA29156@elte.hu> <20090803125059.GB14442@aftab> <20090804135029.GA6775@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090804135029.GA6775@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andreas Herrmann , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Sachin Sant , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Ingo Molnar List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:50:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Mind preparing a separate branch for it (.31-rc5 based) and send = me=20 > > > a pull request so that we can share the commit between the EDAC t= ree=20 > > > and the x86 tree? > >=20 > > Well, Andreas says the patches need a little polishing and he'll=20 > > be sending updated versions soon so you can pick them up. And=20 > > since the EDAC MCE stuff might still change before .32 merge=20 > > window opens, let's synchronize our pull requests instead. In the=20 > > meantime, I'll be rediffing the EDAC stuff against -tip for=20 > > linux-next. >=20 > Would you rebase just due to this commit? No, I wanted to keep the opportunity to be able to rebase the whole series until the very last minute before the merge window, should anything need to be changed... > No need for that, feel free to carry it until Andreas sends an update= d > version. Then i can put it into a separate .31-rc5 based topic that > you can pull into the EDAC tree. =2E.. and this is basically what I had in mind: After you pull them in, I'll rebase my branch against yours for linux-next. I see that Stephen pulls edac before -tip in linux-next so I'll ask him nicely to reorder those. This approach makes most sense anyways since edac relies on a bunch of x86 facilities (topology bits, rd/wrmsr_on_cpus, mcheck etc) and it is only natural that it goes second in linux-next, right? Then the pull requests will go out in the same order during the merge window and we should be fine. --=20 Regards/Gruss, Boris. Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. M=FCnchen, Ger= many Research | Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis M=FCnchen (OSRC) | Registergericht M=FCnchen, HRB Nr. 43632