linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 6
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 22:50:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908062250.51498.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090806192209.513abec7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thursday 06 August 2009 11:22:09 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20090805:

At the moment -next is completely unusable for anything other than
detecting merge conflicts..  Running -next was never a completely
smooth experience but for a past year it was more-or-less doable.
However the last two months have been an absolute horror and I've
been hitting issues way faster than I was able to trace/report
them properly..

Right now I still have following *outstanding* issues (on just *one*
machine/distribution):

- Random (after some long hours) order:6 mode:0x8020 page allocation
  failure (when ipw2200 driver reloads firmware on firmware error).

  [ I had first thought that it was caused by SLQB (which got enabled
    as default somewhere along the way) but it also happens with SLUB
    and I have good reasons to believe that is caused by heavy mm
    changes first seen in next-20090618 (I've been testing next-20090617
    for many days and it never happened there), the last confirmed
    release with the problem is next-20090728. ]

- bdi warning, http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/15/262, (this one goes back
  to at least next-20090708, reconfirmed with next-20090806).

- Random OOPSes on shutdown (since the last week or so, didn't have time
  to investigate them).

- Lockup on stopping iptables (I've just noticed it in next-20090806,
  seems to also happen with next-20090731).

I give up and I'm back to using Linus' tree.. :(

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-06 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-06  9:22 linux-next: Tree for August 6 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-06 20:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-08-07 13:15   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-08-15 16:56     ` mm/ipw2200 regression (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 6) Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-08-16  7:31       ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-16 10:17         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-06  3:27 linux-next: Tree for August 6 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-06  8:28 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200908062250.51498.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).