From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] block: blk-iopoll sysctl iff CONFIG_BLOCK Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 21:21:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20090807192144.GZ12579@kernel.dk> References: <20090807183118.e71b4db2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090807111659.3d8da27f.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:33834 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933046AbZHGTVn (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:21:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090807111659.3d8da27f.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , akpm , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Fri, Aug 07 2009, Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap > > New block-iopoll sysctl should be surrounded by CONFIG_BLOCK to > prevent build error: > > kernel/built-in.o:(.data+0x2990): undefined reference to `blk_iopoll_enabled' Thanks, I'll just kill off this sysctl, it should be driver controller anyway. Was just easier for testing :-) -- Jens Axboe