From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: IDE -next tree Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 14:41:40 +1000 Message-ID: <20090808144140.10e4f2e9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20090807.213713.259828836.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__8_Aug_2009_14_41_40_+1000_TvKpGUIX6SsO+Yzn" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:55623 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751048AbZHHElt (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Aug 2009 00:41:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090807.213713.259828836.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Miller Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Sat__8_Aug_2009_14_41_40_+1000_TvKpGUIX6SsO+Yzn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dave, On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:37:13 -0700 (PDT) David Miller = wrote: > > Stephen, please add: >=20 > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-next-2.6.git >=20 > to your -next tree. So does that mean that the current ide tree (master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6.git) should become ide-current (i.e. it contains bug fixes for the current release)? Or should I just drop it? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Sat__8_Aug_2009_14_41_40_+1000_TvKpGUIX6SsO+Yzn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkp9AgQACgkQjjKRsyhoI8y4hwCgkVZ4rFrBp0zpJzCYUI/Dm7Lz ANQAnRr6WKOjk8D+mc373OECNzEdDnLf =CtcD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__8_Aug_2009_14_41_40_+1000_TvKpGUIX6SsO+Yzn--