From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Felix Blyakher <felixb@sgi.com>, Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 03:28:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090902012844.GA15549@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090902112509.739ce995.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:25:09AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c:63: error: static declaration of 'xfs_inobt_lookup' follows non-static declaration
> fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.h:155: note: previous declaration of 'xfs_inobt_lookup' was here
>
> Caused by commit 2187550525d7bcb8c87689e4eca41b1955bf9ac3 ("xfs:
> rationalize xfs_inobt_lookup*").
I've sent a fix to the list about an hour ago:
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: un-static xfs_inobt_lookup
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
xfs_inobt_lookup is also used in xfs_itable.c, remove the STATIC modifier
from it's declaration to fix non-debug builds.
This was already fixed in my git tree vs the version last posted to the
list.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c 2009-09-01 20:47:28.515468366 -0300
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c 2009-09-01 20:47:33.867913011 -0300
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ xfs_ialloc_cluster_alignment(
/*
* Lookup a record by ino in the btree given by cur.
*/
-STATIC int /* error */
+int /* error */
xfs_inobt_lookup(
struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, /* btree cursor */
xfs_agino_t ino, /* starting inode of chunk */
>
> I have used the version of the xfs tree from next-20090901 for today.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-02 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-02 1:25 linux-next: xfs tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-02 1:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-09-02 1:54 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-09-02 2:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-03 0:05 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-10 2:45 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-11 22:52 ` Dave Chinner
2009-03-12 1:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-15 12:18 ` Dave Chinner
2008-12-03 23:16 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-04 5:20 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-10-30 2:23 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-30 9:08 ` Dave Chinner
2008-11-05 2:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-05 20:47 ` Dave Chinner
2008-11-06 15:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-11-07 5:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-11 2:05 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2008-11-11 2:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090902012844.GA15549@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=felixb@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).