From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: linux-next: block tree build failure Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:30:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20090911053013.GA18599@kernel.dk> References: <20090911143203.e52e294d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:39189 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752672AbZIKFaK (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:30:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090911143203.e52e294d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 11 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jens, > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c: In function 'aoeblk_gdalloc': > drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c:271: error: request for member 'backing_dev_info' in something not a structure or union > > Caused by commit 7cd6134162529e6b7f9eaa5d72b1ef8fe3b355c9 ("writeback: > add name to backing_dev_info"). 'q->blkq' changed to be a pointer in > commit 7135a71b19be1faf48b7148d77844d03bc0717d6 ("aoe: allocate unused > request_queue for sysfs"). > > Please be a bit more careful with rebases. Sorry, I thought I had double checked it... Will fix it now. > I have used the version of the block tree from next-20090910 for today. No problem. -- Jens Axboe