From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: m86k/m68knommu tree build failure
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:12:01 -0400
Message-ID: <20090917131200.GA27366@infradead.org>
References: <20090910151137.fb71c103.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4AA890B5.8000207@snapgear.com> <m363brb4yk.fsf@hase.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:51052 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752290AbZIQNMM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:12:12 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m363brb4yk.fsf@hase.home>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:04:51AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Ah, yes, thanks. I'll fix that. I don't regularly build for m68k,
> > so I missed that in my test builds.
> 
> An m68k implementation is here
> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.m68k/721>.

It would be great if the m68k maintainers could submit it for mainline.