From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 2: percpu compile warnings (i386)
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:40:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091002094030.ffbde6ca.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091002134718.f577be51.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
mm/percpu.c:1873: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
mm/percpu.c:1879: warning: format '%lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'size_t'
The second one is easily fixed (s/%lx/%zu/), but is that the correct fix?
The first one is a max(size_t, unsigned long).
The C99 spec says that the max value of a size_t is:
limit of size_t
SIZE_MAX 65535
(from 7.8.13(2)), but max_distance (the size_t here) is being compared to
unsigned long base_offset, which isn't limited to 65535 AFAICT.
In fact, this test:
if (max_distance > (VMALLOC_END - VMALLOC_START) * 3 / 4) {
checks max_distance > 0x000017ff_ffffffff (on x86_64).
And it looks to me like there is some potential for some value truncation
in the max() operation, even if size_t is not limited to SIZE_MAX.
So maybe the size_t(s) should be changed to unsigned long and the
printk format doesn't need to be fixed... ?
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-02 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-02 3:47 linux-next: Tree for October 2 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-02 16:40 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2009-10-04 0:25 ` linux-next: Tree for October 2: percpu compile warnings (i386) Tejun Heo
2009-10-04 0:37 ` [PATCH] percpu: fix compile warnings Tejun Heo
2009-10-05 2:15 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091002094030.ffbde6ca.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).