From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: isp1362: fix build warnings on 64-bit systems Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:34:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20091006143428.GA27158@kroah.com> References: <1250046053-3097-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20090813234410.GB4406@kroah.com> <8bd0f97a0908131734h2588d240k9000bace38b58e7f@mail.gmail.com> <8bd0f97a0910060132r1dd6b6a4u71eaa8763862aebd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0910060132r1dd6b6a4u71eaa8763862aebd@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Frysinger Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lothar Wassmann , Stephen Rothwell List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:32:29AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 20:34, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 19:44, Greg KH wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:00:53PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> A bunch of places assumed pointers were 32-bits in size (bit checking and > >>> debug output), but none of these affected runtime functionality. > >>> > >>> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell > >>> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger > >> > >> This patch doesn't apply to my tree, what did you make it against? > > > > it was reported against next, so i used that > > so what tree do i need to use to get you to merge this ? i'm guessing > the semantic patch was what caused conflicts (my proposed patch > already included that fix, but too late now). Right now, just do it against Linus's tree, or 2.6.32-rc3 and I can merge it. thanks, greg k-h