From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kamalesh Babulal Subject: Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20091013 - s390x build breaks at mm/fault with !CONFIG_S390_EXEC_PROTECT Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:27:20 +0530 Message-ID: <20091013105720.GB7542@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20091013162312.8b93998b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091013100648.GA7542@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20091013123335.6d6820b3@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> Reply-To: Kamalesh Babulal Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from e23smtp07.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.140]:55305 "EHLO e23smtp07.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754679AbZJMK6E (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:58:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091013123335.6d6820b3@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Stephen Rothwell , heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org * Martin Schwidefsky [2009-10-13 12:33:35]: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:36:48 +0530 > Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > > > next-20091013 randconfig build breaks on s390, with > > CONFIG_S390_EXEC_PROTECT=y > > > > arch/s390/mm/fault.c: In function 'signal_return': > > arch/s390/mm/fault.c:221: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_compat_task' > > make[1]: *** [arch/s390/mm/fault.o] Error 1 > > > > is_compat_task is defined at asm/compat.h, including the > > header, helps > > I'll merge that info "[PATCH] fault handler performance optimization" if you > don't mind. Please feel free to merge it. > > -- > blue skies, > Martin. > > "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. > Kamalesh