From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 14 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:55:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20091014085515.f40067c1.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <20091014163445.f0441473.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rcsinet12.oracle.com ([148.87.113.124]:45657 "EHLO rgminet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934749AbZJNP4L (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:56:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20091014163445.f0441473.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:34:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Changes since 20091013: > > Undropped tree: i7core_edac > > My fixes tree contains a build fix for powerpc/kvm. > > The pci tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > The kbuild tree gained a build failure that required me to remove > include/asm/asm-offsets.h from my object tree. > > The net tree lost its build failure. > > The percpu tree lost its build failure. > > The tty tree still had a build failure for which I reverted a commit. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I have created today's linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git > (patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/next/ ). If you > are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull" > to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the > old one. You should use "git fetch" as mentioned in the FAQ on the wiki > (see below). Hi Stephen, Where are today's .bz2 file and the .sign files? and when did pub/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/ disappear? The kernel.org/kdist/finger_banner file now reports: The latest linux-next version of the Linux kernel is: next-20091013 instead of 20091014. --- ~Randy