From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH -next] vmxnet3: use dev_dbg,
 =?iso-8859-1?q?=09fix_build_for?= CONFIG_BLOCK=n
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:53:17 -0700
Message-ID: <200910151553.17203.dtor@vmware.com>
References: <20091015152538.74a1cb15.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4AD7A569.1040308@oracle.com> <200910151547.48247.dtor@vmware.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200910151547.48247.dtor@vmware.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: pv-drivers@vmware.com
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

On Thursday 15 October 2009 03:47:48 pm Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
> On Thursday 15 October 2009 03:42:49 pm Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Bhavesh Davda wrote:
> > > Who ever compiles with CONFIG_BLOCK=n? Just kidding...
> >
> > or why does networking need CONFIG_BLOCK at all?  ;)
> >
> > > Thanks again for making this change! Ship it!
> >
> > So could I have used adapter->netdev->dev or adapter->pdev->dev ?
> > either of them?  are they the same?
> 
> They are the same.
> 

Hmm.. I take this back, adapter->netdev->dev.parent == adapter->pdev->dev.

-- 
Dmitry