From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] pcmcia: remove pcmcia_get_{first,next}_tuple() Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:39:23 -0700 Message-ID: <20091027143923.GA17627@suse.de> References: <1255907255-28297-2-git-send-email-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> <1255907255-28297-3-git-send-email-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> <1255907255-28297-4-git-send-email-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> <1255907255-28297-5-git-send-email-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> <1255907255-28297-6-git-send-email-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> <1255907255-28297-7-git-send-email-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> <1255907255-28297-8-git-send-email-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> <1255907255-28297-9-git-send-email-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> <20091026151958.a2e7871b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20091027051224.GA10891@isilmar.linta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:58922 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752519AbZJ0Omz (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:42:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091027051224.GA10891@isilmar.linta.de> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:12:24AM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Randy, > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 03:19:58PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > Remove the pcmcia_get_{first,next}_tuple() calls no longer needed by > > > (current) pcmcia device drivers. > > > > linux-next 20091026: > > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_das16_cs.c:155: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcmcia_get_first_tuple' > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_das16_cs.c:156: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcmcia_get_tuple_data' > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_das16_cs.c:883: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcmcia_get_next_tuple' > > > > There are also other comedi/ drivers that this randconfig didn't attempt > > to build that are still using these same interfaces. > > What are the current rules on drivers in staging/ ? Do they need to be > updated as well on API changes? You don't have to do it, no. I'll be glad to do so as long as I get a hint as to what needs to be done :) thanks, greg k-h