Re: [PATCH 9/9] pcmcia: remove pcmcia_get_{first,next}_tuple()

[Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>]

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:27:00PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Greg,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:39:23AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:12:24AM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > > Randy,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 03:19:58PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > > Remove the pcmcia_get_{first,next}_tuple() calls no longer needed by
> > > > > (current) pcmcia device drivers.
> > > > 
> > > > linux-next 20091026:
> > > > 
> > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_das16_cs.c:155: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcmcia_get_first_tuple'
> > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_das16_cs.c:156: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcmcia_get_tuple_data'
> > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_das16_cs.c:883: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcmcia_get_next_tuple'
> > > > 
> > > > There are also other comedi/ drivers that this randconfig didn't attempt
> > > > to build that are still using these same interfaces.
> > > 
> > > What are the current rules on drivers in staging/ ? Do they need to be
> > > updated as well on API changes?
> > 
> > You don't have to do it, no.  I'll be glad to do so as long as I get a
> > hint as to what needs to be done :)
> 
> These hints are in Documentation/pcmcia/driver-changes.txt . However, I'll
> try to get some patches cooked up myself tonight for those drivers. Whom
> shall I submit them to, or shall I just add them to the PCMCIA tree?

You can send them to me, or you can take them in your tree if you want,
whatever is easier for you.

thanks,

greg k-h