From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH] BUILD_BUG_ON: make it handle more cases Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:07:15 +1030 Message-ID: <200911051707.15561.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <4AC1E15502000078000516B5@vpn.id2.novell.com> <20091105112020.33f02552.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200911051658.36265.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200911051658.36265.rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org> Sender: kvm-ppc-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Hollis Blanchard , Jan Beulich , akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, kvm-ppc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 04:58:36 pm Rusty Russell wrote: > I did a 4.3.3 allmodconfig with this patch on 64-bit a few days back and all > was fine. Will try 4.4.0 now. 4.4.1 seems OK (Ubuntu). This is annoying. But I'll withdraw the patches; if there's another reason that 4.4.0 is bad, we can ban it and reintroduce this. I don't think that breaking this hack is enough to declare 4.4.0 verboten. Thanks, Rusty.