linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	systemtap <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
	DLE <dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] x86 insn decoder test updates (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 29 (x86 posttest))
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:13:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091117061352.GE30852@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091116230611.5250.86656.stgit@harusame>


* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com> wrote:

> Here are the patches which update x86 instruction decoder build-time 
> test. As Stephen reported on linux-next, sometimes objdump decodes bad 
> instructions as normal. This will cause a false positive result on x86 
> insn decoder test. This patches update the test as below;
>
>  - Show more information with V=1
>  - Show in which symbol the difference places.
>  - Just warning instead of build failure.

yes, -tip testing was showing such build bugs too:

 Error: ffffffff8104aae3:	c5 83 3d 49 80 ee    	lds    0xffffffffee80493d(%rbx),%eax
 Error: objdump says 6 bytes, but insn_get_length() says 3 (attr:0)

it happens with older tools, such as binutils-2.17. Modern binutils 
(2.19) is fine.

We dont want to remove the build error: it helped us fix a number of 
real bugs in the decoder - instead please try to create a make based 
workaround based on binutils, to not run the test with binutils older 
than 2.19 or so.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-17  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-16 23:06 [PATCH -next 0/3] x86 insn decoder test updates (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 29 (x86 posttest)) Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-16 23:06 ` [PATCH -next 1/3] x86: Add verbose option to insn decoder test Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-16 23:06 ` [PATCH -next 2/3] x86: Show symbol name if insn decoder test failed Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-16 23:06 ` [PATCH -next 3/3] x86: insn decoder test shows build warning Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-17  6:13 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-17  6:55   ` [PATCH -next 0/3] x86 insn decoder test updates (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 29 (x86 posttest)) Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-18  4:42   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-20 17:13   ` [PATCH -tip 0/2] x86 insn decoder test checking objdump version Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-20 17:13     ` [PATCH -tip 1/2] [BUGFIX] x86: Fix insn decoder test typos Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-20 17:13     ` [PATCH -tip 2/2] x86: insn decoder test checks objdump version Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091117061352.GE30852@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).