From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
systemtap <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] x86 insn decoder test updates (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 29 (x86 posttest))
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:13:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091117061352.GE30852@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091116230611.5250.86656.stgit@harusame>
* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com> wrote:
> Here are the patches which update x86 instruction decoder build-time
> test. As Stephen reported on linux-next, sometimes objdump decodes bad
> instructions as normal. This will cause a false positive result on x86
> insn decoder test. This patches update the test as below;
>
> - Show more information with V=1
> - Show in which symbol the difference places.
> - Just warning instead of build failure.
yes, -tip testing was showing such build bugs too:
Error: ffffffff8104aae3: c5 83 3d 49 80 ee lds 0xffffffffee80493d(%rbx),%eax
Error: objdump says 6 bytes, but insn_get_length() says 3 (attr:0)
it happens with older tools, such as binutils-2.17. Modern binutils
(2.19) is fine.
We dont want to remove the build error: it helped us fix a number of
real bugs in the decoder - instead please try to create a make based
workaround based on binutils, to not run the test with binutils older
than 2.19 or so.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-17 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-16 23:06 [PATCH -next 0/3] x86 insn decoder test updates (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 29 (x86 posttest)) Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-16 23:06 ` [PATCH -next 1/3] x86: Add verbose option to insn decoder test Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-16 23:06 ` [PATCH -next 2/3] x86: Show symbol name if insn decoder test failed Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-16 23:06 ` [PATCH -next 3/3] x86: insn decoder test shows build warning Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-17 6:13 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-17 6:55 ` [PATCH -next 0/3] x86 insn decoder test updates (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 29 (x86 posttest)) Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-18 4:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-20 17:13 ` [PATCH -tip 0/2] x86 insn decoder test checking objdump version Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-20 17:13 ` [PATCH -tip 1/2] [BUGFIX] x86: Fix insn decoder test typos Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-20 17:13 ` [PATCH -tip 2/2] x86: insn decoder test checks objdump version Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091117061352.GE30852@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).