From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 23 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:38:44 -0800 Message-ID: <20091123233843.GA13464@suse.de> References: <20091123185232.1423c56b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091123111510.9b0c0714.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <200911240924.54675.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20091124103318.bfcb504c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:43065 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932123AbZKWXkB (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:40:01 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091124103318.bfcb504c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Rusty Russell , Randy Dunlap , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:33:18AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rusty, > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:24:54 +1030 Rusty Russell wrote: > > > > And I guess linux-next doesn't build staging? > > Correct - it breaks to much and too often :-) Yes, remember, it's crap, you don't want to build it :) thanks, greg k-h