From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ext4 tree Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:45:22 -0500 Message-ID: <20091125114522.GD14289@thunk.org> References: <20091125183414.eb45acca.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:16:43PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Today's linux-next merge of the trivial tree got a conflict in > > fs/ext4/balloc.c between commit 4433871130f36585fde38e7dd817433296648945 > > ("ext4: fold ext4_free_blocks() and ext4_mb_free_blocks()") from the ext4 > > tree and commit 15dcf8433b514d1dc1b80d87a0798c2db2c37e95 ("tree-wide: fix > > some typos and punctuation in comments") from the trivial tree. > > > > The former moved the comment fixed by the latter and fixed the typo along > > the way. > > Dropped the mballoc hunk from my queue, thanks. You mean balloc hunk, I hope. (In the commit in question, I moved the comment from fs/ext4/balloc.c to fs/ext4/mballoc.c.) - Ted