From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: i2c tree build warning Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:50:25 +1100 Message-ID: <20091126195025.d8bf50d2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20091126140600.2f55ab0e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091126091829.74d3b7ce@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__26_Nov_2009_19_50_25_+1100_TJ.nCH47.7+WEr47" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:51242 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760042AbZKZIuY (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:50:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091126091829.74d3b7ce@hyperion.delvare> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jean Delvare Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang --Signature=_Thu__26_Nov_2009_19_50_25_+1100_TJ.nCH47.7+WEr47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jean, On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:18:29 +0100 Jean Delvare wrote: > > Thanks for reporting. The warning did not show on my 32-bit x86 system, > and I guess it did not show on Wolfram's system either, otherwise we'd > have fixed it. >=20 > Does the following patch fix the warning for you? Yes. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Thu__26_Nov_2009_19_50_25_+1100_TJ.nCH47.7+WEr47 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksOQVEACgkQjjKRsyhoI8xztgCfVq2lsLKNHEsPGsggBV7DRmPL KncAoJZQFGb/SBYNv+Pfv6E2jfng56zD =2v90 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__26_Nov_2009_19_50_25_+1100_TJ.nCH47.7+WEr47--