From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 tip/sched/core] sched: rename preempt_notifier to sched_notifier and always enable it
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:02:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091127070254.GA1547@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B0F73CA.7090804@kernel.org>
* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Please send all sched.c modifications via the scheduler tree. Going
> > via other trees is fine when there's agreement by the maintainers -
> > but this is one of the rare cases where that's not the case.
>
> Yeah, sure. So, two patchsets. One for sched/core doing pure
> reorganization without any functional changes. The other for
> sched/notifier (or whatever name you would prefer) which is purely for
> development and testing and will not be pushed to Linus unless it
> receives notifier framework cleanup. wq#for-next will pull from
> sched/notifier and be exported to linux-next but it will never be
> submitted to Linus until sched/notifier is cleaned up. Am I
> understanding it correctly?
Yeah, that would be fine.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-27 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-26 8:00 linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-26 8:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-26 9:15 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-26 9:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-26 9:48 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-26 9:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-26 10:11 ` [PATCH 1/4 tip/sched/core] sched: rename preempt_notifier to sched_notifier and always enable it Tejun Heo
2009-11-26 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-26 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-26 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-26 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-26 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-27 2:11 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-27 4:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-27 5:38 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-27 5:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-27 6:01 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-27 6:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-27 6:16 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-27 6:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-27 6:38 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-27 7:02 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-26 10:44 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-27 3:33 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-11-27 4:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-26 10:13 ` [PATCH 2/4 tip/sched/core] sched: update sched_notifier and add wakeup/sleep notifications Tejun Heo
2009-11-26 10:13 ` [PATCH 3/4 tip/sched/core] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() and implement try_to_wake_up_local() Tejun Heo
2009-11-26 10:14 ` [PATCH 4/4 tip/sched/core] sched: implement force_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091127070254.GA1547@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).