From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 27 (logfs: hash_index) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:43:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20091128124336.GA19205@logfs.org> References: <20091127181915.a6af7ba3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B10A04A.7090703@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B10A04A.7090703@oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 November 2009 20:00:10 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > Changes since 20091126: >=20 >=20 > on i386 (X86_32): >=20 > fs/built-in.o: In function `hash_index': > dir.c:(.text+0x6c1f2): undefined reference to `__umoddi3' Oops! Fixed now. J=C3=B6rn --=20 Linux is more the core point of a concept that surrounds "open source" which, in turn, is based on a false concept. This concept is that people actually want to look at source code. -- Rob Enderle