From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:22:29 +1030 Message-ID: <200912151422.29906.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20091211122648.8b305b52.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091214153528.e29f33a6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:41705 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758022AbZLODwd (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:52:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091214153528.e29f33a6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:05:28 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rusty, > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c: In function 'powernowk8_target': > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:1139: error: implicit declaration of function 'tsk_cpumask' > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:1139: warning: passing argument 2 of 'cpumask_copy' makes pointer from integer without a cast > > include/linux/cpumask.h:466: note: expected 'const struct cpumask *' but argument is of type 'int' > > > > Caused by commit 9dd4c5ab546fcac98cfb9ca24ed5cc1bf7f08334 > > ("cpumask:tsk_cpus_allowed-not-tsk_cpumask") from the rr tree interacting > > with commit b8cbe7e82ec8b55d7bbdde66fc69e788fde00dc6 ("[CPUFREQ] cpumask: > > don't put a cpumask on the stack in x86...cpufreq/powernow-k8.c") from > > the cpufreq tree. > > The cpufreq patch above is now in Linus' tree, so You should add the > patch below to your tree (or squash it into the affected patch). Thanks, done and rebased. Cheers, Rusty.