From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16 (amd64_edac) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:45:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20091216174524.GH11618@aftab> References: <20091216183212.118c5e14.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091216092424.5f87214c.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <4B2919BD.40001@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from va3ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.180.15]:6751 "EHLO VA3EHSOBE005.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751715AbZLPRpY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:45:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B2919BD.40001@zytor.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 09:32:45AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 12/16/2009 09:24 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:32:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >=20 > >> Hi all, > >> > >> My usual call for calm: please do not put stuff destined for 2.6.3= 4 into > >> linux-next trees until after 2.6.33-rc1. > >> > >> Changes since 20091215: > >=20 > >=20 > > When CONFIG_SMP=3Dn, CONFIG_X86_MSR=3Dm: > >=20 > > ERROR: "msrs_free" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "msrs_alloc" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined! > >=20 > >=20 > > Should EDAC_AMD64 also depend on SMP? > >=20 >=20 > That seems absurd... more likely msrs_free/msrs_alloc should not be > SMP-specific, or stubs need to be provided. see : obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) :=3D msr.o --=20 Regards/Gruss, Boris. Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. M=FCnchen, Ger= many Research | Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Andrew Bowd, Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano= Meroni Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis M=FCnchen (OSRC) | Registergericht M=FCnchen, HRB Nr. 43632