From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: tip tree build failure Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:32:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20100104163159.GD23652@elte.hu> References: <20100104235931.abcf2bc5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:32955 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753372Ab0ADQcO (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:32:14 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100104235931.abcf2bc5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thiago Farina * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next build (s390x defconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/panic.c:134: error: 'CALLER_ADDR0' undeclared (first use in this function) > > Caused by commit eba3fe4416f3cc2ce043fb304b6c35a69dca3bdb ("kernel: Use > CALLER_ADDR0 macro"). Thanks - apparently CALLER_ADDR0 isnt generally available. I've reverted this patch for now. Ingo