From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: linux-next: add utrace tree Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:39:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20100122193923.GB13185@redhat.com> References: <20100120072925.GA11395@elte.hu> <20100121013822.28781960.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100122111747.3c224dfd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100121163004.8779bd69.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100121163145.7e958c3f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100122005147.GD22003@redhat.com> <20100121170541.7425ff10.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100122052139.GA20532@in.ibm.com> <18867.1264167798@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18867.1264167798@localhost> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: utrace-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: utrace-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Peter Zijlstra , Fr??d??ric Weisbecker , LKML , Steven Rostedt , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , utrace-devel@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 01/22, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > No, that only proves it's compatible enough for gdb to not care. The problem > is all those *other* packages that abuse ptrace in totally crackhead ways. > > (No, I can't name them - but ptrace is the sort of interface that almost > encourages its use for things somewhere between crackhead and mad-scientist, > so they're almost certainly out there.. WAY out there.. :) Yes, this is true. We are trying to test it as much as possible. Oleg.