From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the blackfin tree Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 02:08:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20100301010849.GA7210@nowhere> References: <20100301120321.8851ba86.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100301120321.8851ba86.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Mike Frysinger , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Frysinger List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:03:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Mike, > > After merging the blackfin tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) > failed like this: > > kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:402: error: redefinition of 'arch_syscall_addr' > kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:397: note: previous definition of 'arch_syscall_addr' was here > > Caused by commit d156d1881ea54ec609d92388601661c2679439bb ("ftrace: unify > arch_syscall_addr() implementations") from the blackfin tree interacting Oh, why is this patch in the blackfin tree? > with commit e7b8e675d9c71b868b66f62f725a948047514719 ("tracing: Unify > arch_syscall_addr() implementations") from Linus' tree. > > These are slightly different versions of the same patch. but merging with the blackfin tree managed to add a second copy of the above function. I have applied the following patch for today. > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au > > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:56:09 +1100 > Subject: [PATCH] blackfin: fix mismerge of kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > --- > kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 5 ----- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c > index 37ca709..cba47d7 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c > @@ -399,11 +399,6 @@ unsigned long __init arch_syscall_addr(int nr) > return (unsigned long)sys_call_table[nr]; > } > > -unsigned long __init arch_syscall_addr(int nr) > -{ > - return (unsigned long)sys_call_table[nr]; > -} > - > int __init init_ftrace_syscalls(void) > { > struct syscall_metadata *meta; Looks like the right patch yeah. Thanks.