linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the block tree

linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the block tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Greg,

Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c between commit
086fa5ff0854c676ec333760f4c0154b3b242616 ("block: Rename
blk_queue_max_sectors to blk_queue_max_hw_sectors") from the block tree
and commit 628726dbb5ebbec77336019ac4e1f60cf3ba08c1 ("usb-storage: use
max_hw_sectors instead of max_sectors") from the usb tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
index aadc16b,354c38e..0000000
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
@@@ -133,8 -133,8 +133,8 @@@ static int slave_configure(struct scsi_
  
  		if (us->fflags & US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_MIN)
  			max_sectors = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE >> 9;
- 		if (queue_max_sectors(sdev->request_queue) > max_sectors)
+ 		if (queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue) > max_sectors)
 -			blk_queue_max_sectors(sdev->request_queue,
 +			blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue,
  					      max_sectors);
  	} else if (sdev->type == TYPE_TAPE) {
  		/* Tapes need much higher max_sector limits, so just
@@@ -494,9 -494,9 +494,9 @@@ static ssize_t store_max_sectors(struc
  	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
  	unsigned short ms;
  
- 	if (sscanf(buf, "%hu", &ms) > 0 && ms <= SCSI_DEFAULT_MAX_SECTORS) {
+ 	if (sscanf(buf, "%hu", &ms) > 0) {
 -		blk_queue_max_sectors(sdev->request_queue, ms);
 +		blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, ms);
- 		return strlen(buf);
+ 		return count;
  	}
  	return -EINVAL;	
  }

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the block tree

[Jens Axboe]

On Mon, Mar 01 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in
> drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c between commit
> 086fa5ff0854c676ec333760f4c0154b3b242616 ("block: Rename
> blk_queue_max_sectors to blk_queue_max_hw_sectors") from the block tree
> and commit 628726dbb5ebbec77336019ac4e1f60cf3ba08c1 ("usb-storage: use
> max_hw_sectors instead of max_sectors") from the usb tree.
> 
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

Thanks Stephen, looks good.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the block tree

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:04:03AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c between commit
> > 086fa5ff0854c676ec333760f4c0154b3b242616 ("block: Rename
> > blk_queue_max_sectors to blk_queue_max_hw_sectors") from the block tree
> > and commit 628726dbb5ebbec77336019ac4e1f60cf3ba08c1 ("usb-storage: use
> > max_hw_sectors instead of max_sectors") from the usb tree.
> > 
> > Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary.
> 
> Thanks Stephen, looks good.

I've made these changes in the patch set I sent to Linus.

thanks,

greg k-h