From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 30 (CONFIG_SYSFS=n) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 09:24:59 -0700 Message-ID: <20100505162459.GA20296@suse.de> References: <20100430163538.7253a9e0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100430105016.40b51636.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20100505091738.7ec27479.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:55865 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934813Ab0EEQ1S (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2010 12:27:18 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100505091738.7ec27479.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Stephen Rothwell , Eric Biederman On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:17:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:50:16 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:35:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20100429: > > > > > > When CONFIG_SYSFS is disabled: > > > > include/linux/sysfs.h:330: error: parameter 1 ('type') has incomplete type > > > Still have this in linux-next of May 5-2010. Eric, this is due to your changes, care to fix it up? thanks, greg k-h